Law of First Knowledge

The law of first knowledge suggests that we tend to see only the things that confirm what we already believe.  I’ve seen it put another way, “To continue to believe whatever we’ve learned first, regardless of later evidence against it.” This one really sent me off into some deep and introspective thinking with the following question: “How far back does the law of first knowledge go?” 

Does first knowledge suggest that the things we experience/learn at an early age stay with us even though we learn differently as we get older? I know I have insecurities that probably go back to when I was a child. Even though I logically know better and have supporting evidence to the contrary, I still have my moments. I can go extended periods without the thoughts of insecurity, then some words or an event can trigger them and here come the feelings.  Logically, I know they will pass, but they can be a butt kickin while they linger around.

Lately, they have been dancing around in my head too much. In fact, the insecurities have been the main topic of discussion with my counselor for the last month or so. 

Three days ago, I wrote down my top five insecurities in one column.  In the second column, I wrote down the logic and supporting evidence that refutes and completely disproves the insecurities, yet I still feel them.  For me, seeing it on paper just helps me process and validate the feelings rather than the continued chatter in my head and emotional discomfort in my heart.  Keeping the heart and head connected takes work, but the connection is oh so necessary for a balanced life.     

I’m curious to hear your take on the Law of First Knowledge.